In Islamic tradition the term al-Furqan indicate the means of discrimination, since that is then passed to denote the Quran itself, which is the name of a sura . The fan is
is mentioned (Matthew: 3:17) "He has a winnowing fan, will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but he will burn the chaff." Sieve, sieve, sieve. Cribrum .
But today seems to discriminate against a business 'discriminatory'. Discrimination has taken on a meaning to our negative, anti-democratic, an infringement egalitarian sentiment. A Threat to the relativism of view, the supreme authority which rests on individualism absolute.
corollary of this semantic shift is the imperative is the impossibility, in terms of values, say no to someone. Maybe, but maybe, some teacher or some psychologist "developmental" dares to say that there are 'no' to help you grow. But when it crosses the threshold of maturity (personal or what other?) The individual no longer tolerate an opinion that it overlaps the outer, higher-level to him. As the citizen is not a child in need of protection, so modern man can not say - no matter who or when and how - what is good and evil. Is this not the essence of democracy?
values \u200b\u200bchange and so the Truth must adapt to the times. So did the Second Vatican Council, putting the Law of the fan is historicism.
As a child I watched my father a mason. We passed the sand to separate according to the gauge. The mother from the flour lumps. Threw the rice up and blew away the impurities. The pebbles were cleverly separated from the heavier grains.
Some wanted to improve its law. Know more serious heresy?
Its name is Progress.
is mentioned (Matthew: 3:17) "He has a winnowing fan, will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but he will burn the chaff." Sieve, sieve, sieve. Cribrum .
But today seems to discriminate against a business 'discriminatory'. Discrimination has taken on a meaning to our negative, anti-democratic, an infringement egalitarian sentiment. A Threat to the relativism of view, the supreme authority which rests on individualism absolute.
corollary of this semantic shift is the imperative is the impossibility, in terms of values, say no to someone. Maybe, but maybe, some teacher or some psychologist "developmental" dares to say that there are 'no' to help you grow. But when it crosses the threshold of maturity (personal or what other?) The individual no longer tolerate an opinion that it overlaps the outer, higher-level to him. As the citizen is not a child in need of protection, so modern man can not say - no matter who or when and how - what is good and evil. Is this not the essence of democracy?
values \u200b\u200bchange and so the Truth must adapt to the times. So did the Second Vatican Council, putting the Law of the fan is historicism.
As a child I watched my father a mason. We passed the sand to separate according to the gauge. The mother from the flour lumps. Threw the rice up and blew away the impurities. The pebbles were cleverly separated from the heavier grains.
Some wanted to improve its law. Know more serious heresy?
Its name is Progress.
0 comments:
Post a Comment