A comment on what was written previously about the cruel treatment inflicted, in general, many if not all animal species and in various ways more or less bloody (basic question of 28.2) and which also offers a video, drives us to make some comments that we consider non-negligible interest
knew the movie, but apparently we missed the beginning. In these minutes the film, other than raw and carat pure documentary in which murderous brutality and groans and agonizing and unnecessary suffering are meticulous and merciless in the past review, here you can note, as if it were a frame introduction, an explanatory framework that also involves broader human violence directed against its own species. And inevitably, the shots chosen to exemplify an equation of human history and the animal slaughter and industrial level, the 'stereotypical' shots dating back to World War II, those of the leader of a belligerent power, and skeletal images of prisoners in concentration camps.
I have no interest in historical or political diatribes, let alone take on a propettiva part, since what happens at the empirical level in the events of ancient history of mankind, the manifest order of things, comes in advance predefined by determinations that occur at the metaphysical level and beyond. By the emergence of conditions of change and multiplication of causal factors that make empirical when more and more difficult to synthesize with the tools of historical research that have emerged in recent centuries of a much longer human history. Indeed, the proliferation of explanatory factors seem to create a more intricate labyrinth, such that the truth 'of events', rather than depend on the principles, appears to be produced piecemeal, partial, a result of propaganda opposing artifact. What goes inabisssandosi
Truth in modern times, it's not a big deal. Just as the labyrinths epistemology of modern science rather than to uncover the 'facts' looks increasingly like a smokescreen, a maze, a labyrinth in which he wins who does the voice fragments, and is able to manipulate and persuade others of the 'facts'.
may be worthy of interest, on the other hand, look like animal abuse is understood as a question of relevance of the 'undercut' of human beings, which originated from a 'fact' aggressive characteristic of the human being is thus not wonder, will manifest itself up even more with large proportions of cynicism over helpless animals.
In other words, this implies a clear doctrinal error. Retracing the negligence towards human animals to a sphere entirely typical of the secular modern science that are independent and are opposed to any reality that escapes the senses, there is nothing to trace a route known to the progress of rational thought and the mechanistic modern, well-tested path of elimination of traditional components inherited designed to keep the truth from the break doggedly materialistic.
In our short paper, the neglect of animals in general that has been spread to every continent in parallel with the expansion and decline of the West, was set against the treatment they reserve their traditional civilizations . Indigenous civilizations, which are defined incorrectly "Primitive" but that would be more correct to call 'primitive' as they have been able to extend any more than we have been able to do, the consciousness of a subsidiary, a 'birthright' of the Creator. This memory, TRADITION
dhikr according to Islamic
anamnesis in Plato's language, is ultimately the factor that makes the difference in the relationships with animals, not carrying organisms 'rights' as claimed by environmentalists, animal rights, environmentalists, green, reviews widely used in modern mind, but be positioned in different levels and placed in a clear hierarchy, which includes plants and minerals, according to the hierarchical status of una coscienza universale.
Sacrificio vedico del cavallo
C. Eastman - uno Sioux egli stesso, ma per così dire "civilizzato" - parla della grande naturalezza con cui gli Indiani d'America, avvezzi ai grandi spazi solitari e ai profondi silenzi della loro 'incontaminata' Natura, contemplassero il "Grande Mistero", "senza complicazione interiore - dice - ...perchè ogni discorso è necessariamente debole e imperfetto..."
D'altro canto, la fragilità delle opinioni dei progressisti moderni, sopra ricordati, si tradisce allorchè il rispetto dei 'diritti' animali che si vorrebbe 'universale' scende ad un pragmatico compromesso ecosistemico che essi chiamano "sostenibile". Cosicchè si uccidono comunque, però prediligendo forme di morte dolce, che ricordono inevitabilmente l'eutanasia. 'Traguardo' che i progressisti propongono tanto per gli animali quanto per gli esseri umani.
La mentalità tradizionale riconosce una profonda affinità, identificazione tra e con animali, vegetali , fenomeni naturali e uomini. Un'autentica parentela. Il sapere profano moderno chiama questo atteggiamento "totemismo" e ne studia ogni forma di relazione esteriore, precludendo così ogni possibilità di comprendere le valenze prettamente spirituali di tale "parentela".
Del resto, Gesù stesso nega energicamente, a beneficio dei "cuori induriti", di cui i moderni senz'altro sono gran parte, il valore della consanguineità di figliolanza e di parentela rimarcando il primato assoluto dello Spirito. «Se uno viene a me e non odia suo padre e sua madre, moglie e figli fratelli e sorelle e perfino la sua propria vita,
non può essere mio discepolo ” (
Luc 14:26-27 ). "E' lo spirito che dà la vita, la carne non giova a nulla" (Giov. 6:63). Odiare padre e madre non osta con il comandamento divino di onorarli. Impone semplicemente di non idolatrare il sangue, la discendenza fisiologica.
L'uccisione è senz'altro vissuta con angoscia and guilt (see also "Kill or sacrifice?", 26.1). It is true that the aseptic process of industrial slaughterhouses to protect him from such unpleasantness. It is one thing to see, hear, smell the flow of blood is to find another animal parts, cold, clean and anemic, the refrigerated display cases.
me the real headache for the modern mind is the sacrifice, that is the ritual killing. It is not surprising that the ritual sacrifice be hard for Westerners: it is a necessary consequence of the process of secularization. Before being involved sacrifice, is the rite that is an action, a gesture, which has lost its meaning.
The action is understood and justified By virtue of its consequences. Action must be productive, or at least aimed at a concrete and useful result. We questioned the usefulness of art. What is a painting to hang on the wall? A sculpture is something other than an ornament? The hostess just hopes that intonino with the color of the sofas and upholstery!
But what about the ritual? What's the use? Anyone who thinks that we should cooperate with the Cosmos why you keep perpetuating? Those who think we live in the dimension of the manifest of the fragmented, of the manifold, by the fragmentation of Being a primitive, primary, supreme? From the One to the fragments of which were once part of? But above all, that this condition of exile of the pieces we can proceed for its reconstruction? "Gather what is spread"?
The pieces are fragments of our relatives, are lovingly put back together, coagulated, blended again in a league, after the fade.
Far from being useless, the ritual of sacrifice is even necessary.
Tollis peccata mundi Agnus Dei here . The sacrifice of the fracture back together, split up, reconcile the manifest order of things that the duality is spofondare in a conflict, blind abyss of suffering and victimization, leading to the extreme of the cycle.
"What is essential, in the sacrifice - AK Coomaraswamy writes - is first split, and secondly to bring together", The Supreme Being,
Mahapurusha , "as one becomes many, and as many again becomes one" (Hinduism and Buddhism
, p. 26).. "From Him and to Him we return", hope Koranic words, if we were 'cleansed' the fan is divine.
The ritual action is to restore a "primordial state." In other words, the empirical and materialistic mentality, is useless, as is the art (modern sense). But as the art has become useless, following a process of degradation, as traditionally the
' art, ars
, beauty and utility were indistinguishable, so the ritual has become useless and act unnecessary, the result of a process of loss of the sacred, as the consolidation in the various traditions of the Cosmos (
rta ) meant primarily get rid of the utility, dall'aspettattiva of its fruits, and the man is celebrating sacrifices too ' he, as he starts the journey to its termination, work that is purification and production.
There is concern now: how to meet the needs of a material civilization purified, solar? The priest, the Brahman
, dying to the world that he needs to eat? By the end of Sanskrit
amrta obviously related to
rta , indicating the drink of the gods, soma
food, like the Greeks,
ambrosia was their nectar.
Manna's food heaven. Why worry about the digestive processes when one aims for transhumanist?
sacrifice so do not feed it, does not make the food ritually pure, even eternizza us, makes it unnecessary. Far from being restricted to a privileged group action - if so you autovanificherebbe - is a collective work, united, and coagulants coagulated (in the Middle Ages, there was no corporation that is not put under the protection of a saint). "It requires the cooperation of all the arts, which equates to the sacrificer
Vishwakarma same" (R. Guenon,
symbols of science Sacred , p.. 261). The craftsman, or workman neither artist is the servant who works for "vineyard of the Lord." There is something constructive in the word
Vishwakarma, the Almighty, the Great Architect of the Universe, the Demiurge. The craftsman who does not follow his law egotism, but would seek perfection in what he does, gets rid of the fruit of his action and is nourished by the perfection of his action now purified, has become a sacrificer (
sacrum facere ). He works as God commands, and in so doing participate in the
Vishwakarma. Other one might add, we wanted to warn the many "false prophets, seers and enlightened fake very active in our time. Their distinctive and unmistakable sign that reveals their deception in the midst of a mixture of true and false seemingly indiscernible, is their failure lost many, the material, the concrete, the changing.
Massimo Fini, essayist and writer, soul and critical view of modernity, rejects both capitalism and communism, right and left are identified in the languages \u200b\u200bdiverssi materiaalismo. It offers a pure human being, authentic. But this is not quite as Humanism, which is nothing but a way of saying daDio deviation, which began on our ono trouble?
Others see an approaching golden age of spiritual awakening in political turmoil in North Africa,
bearers of a democratic renewal,
primarily in Egypt, the ancient black earth 's
to Kimia, indecipherable and the Pyramids of Wisdom astronomy of his priests, who may prelude to alien landings and amazing spacecraft, between the Nile and the Aztecs. But as a sign of strengthening democracy cyclical, "reform of the modern mentality"? But evil is not the medicine! As if to say that the experimental sciences confirmation from what the tradition says. What God requires "evidence of its existence" to make themselves credible!
Yes Maybe in 2012.
We will in future increasingly bump into pseudo
guru - like those who reject the macellazzione for reasons that go back to history and politics - that while discussing the Kali-Yuga
if the damage to his legs, by stealth, taking away the safe under his arm!
Comunque nessun allarmismo ingiustificato. Nessuna contrapposizione tra "apocalittici" e "integrati", c'è la ragionevole certezza di una via di mezzo. La celebre asserzione è del noto scrittore e accademico Umberto Eco, come molti ricorderanno. Il quale dimostrando la sua profonda comprensione dei tempi si è recato fino a Gerusalemme per dire che Berlusconi regge il paragone solo with Hitler. And for those who have not yet understood from his writings 'strictly enlightened and progressive', tells us that "the journalists said he appreciated the Israeli books and the themes of his writings are influenced by Jewish culture." If he says so .... 
